Spend wisely.

As I endeavor to find ever-purer products for use on my person, home, family, and even pets, a major tension has become biting the bullet on the higher price the right products command. It feels better knowing I’m not being snowed, my confidence bolstered by EWG/SkinDeep and GoodGuide as non-denominational advisors.

As I recently trolled the baby section at Target, I found one of the most lauded “pure” brands the world has to offer. California Baby sunscreen. I literally exclaimed: “they have California Baby!” My wife said: “you’re acting like a nerd.” She was right, but the excitement in that Target aisle was palpable.

I lifted the tiny tube like a precious Fabergé egg. I caressed it – I’d never been this close before. It was like petting a unicorn. I prepared to gingerly place several tubes in the cart, certain that a red-vested assistant manager would appear at any moment and scorn “what’s that doing here?” and take it away. It then occurred to me to glance at the price. Roughly $20 for 3 ounces. I was sure it was a misprint. But my wife’s disapproving grimace – both at me and the price placard – confirmed my fears. I felt like I was ten years old and my mom had just issued the worst word in the English language in response to pleading and begging: “maybe.”

I’d pay to have a photo of the look on my face. In fact, it may be worth scouring the Target security footage to score an instant YouTube classic.

Here I had found a near-fabled pure product – in an actual store, no less – and it was so expensive you’d need a credit check to buy it. And I’m no coupon cutter. I live the “you get what you pay for,” “at least I’ll get miles,” “work hard, play hard” compensatory mantra of consumer spending.

But this was a new frontier. I looked at my wife with, I’m sure, a pathetic expression of panic. “Should I get it?” I muttered. She shrugged: “If it’s that important to you.”

Mind you, she has been a willing passenger on my march to purity, but more tolerated it than wholly endorsed it. As much as I believe that you do get what you pay for, this moment caused a micro-epiphany, right there in Target.

I won’t even ponder “the meaning of life” in a blog. Please. But there’s no question that one cause worth investing in is the health of one’s family. The nuance can be debated, but what’s that they say about your health?…

My mind reeling, I made my decision – a purchase decision so involved it rivaled that of my first house – I did not buy the blasted sunscreen. $20 for 3 ounces?

But my brush with the most expensive semi-liquid known to man has caused me to loosen up and keep in perspective the fact that, when it comes to what’s best for my kids, it’s simply worth spending more.

Oh yeah… we’re currently enjoying a tube of Neutrogena Pure & Free – a bargain at about $11 for 3 ounces (purchased at Toys R Us).

Lotion by the gallon

As my ever-increasing scrutiny over the products we use continues, I turned my attention to an ever-present product in our home – hand lotion. This is not the first time I’ve noticed the revolving door of lotion bottles that is our bathroom vanity, but I’m no longer only irritated by the fact that you can’t get the top off  and end up throwing away about three handfuls along with the plastic container.

No, I went a step further and engaged in my now ritualistic – and love / hate practice – of checking our lotion brand in the EWG SkinDeep database. We use Vasoline Intensive Care Advanced Healing lotion. I recently mandated the switch to “fragrance free,” pleased with my step to get one more trace chemical out of our home.

Pleased, that is, until I reviewed the Skin Deep report on our beloved salve. I hit enter and watched the cold, unflinching SkinDeep database report its cruel facts as to the litany of chemicals my “high hazard” (an 8 out of 10) lotion contained, and the ghastly health problems to which those ingredients are linked. I might as well have enjoyed the fragrance, as its absence has no bearing on the purity (or lack thereof) of this lotion. As helpful as I find the database, it doesn’t exactly sugar coat the news:

http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/product.php?prod_id=61047

And with a few deft calculations, I estimated that my wife and I each rub approximately 143 ounces into our skin in a given year. That’s well over a gallon.

At least there’s good news, I thought: we use J&J Baby Lotion on our kids. Surely Johnson & Johnson, “The #1 Choice of Hospitals,” would deliver the goods. Whoops… another “high hazard” 8 out of 10.

http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/product.php?prod_id=47660

I also found some disconcerting back-and-forth on the iconic Johnson’s Baby Shampoo. A lone, ironic tear ran down my cheek…

http://safecosmetics.org//article.php?id=521

http://www.cosmeticsdatabase.com/product.php?prod_id=147083&refurl=%2Fbrowse.php%3Fcategory%3Dbaby+shampoo%26

I didn’t bother torturing myself with the annual tonnage the kids get. I’m taking action.

The first product we tried was a pump container of Avalon Organics hand lotion – a solid, “low hazard” 2 according to the unbiased SkinDeep. I put it by the sink in the kitchen, a high traffic torture test of Madge’s proverbial dishpan hands. Not only is it a great product, the family has made sport of dispensing the absolute tiniest mini-droplet possible with each fraction of a pump. A little goes a long way.

It’s more expensive than “regular” lotion, but we use so much less I bet we’ll come out ahead (and that’s not even considering the peace of mind of not pumping chemicals onto our skin). Plus the bottle is cool looking and actually looks good next to the sink.
Lotion - Avalon
Our gross tonnage of lotion just got less so.

Walmart mandates sustainability (?)

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124766892562645475.html

This Walmart sustainability announcement is a pretty big deal. The key question is whether Walmart – notorious for merciless price pressures on manufacturers – will really step up and partner with its suppliers, or just pinch them further into the vice of price pressure. They should act in a meaningful way, since it’s Walmart price pressure that’s resulted in so many Chinese, irresponsibly-manufactured products in the name of “everyday low prices.” Will they really change their tune? Since Walmart sells about 30% of the products in just about any category they carry, it will make a tremendous impact – one way or the other…

Here’s to transparency.

The new “cause” movie, Food, Inc. promises to re-galvanize our resolve to make better choices as to what we consume (Fast Food Nation is but a distant memory). See the trailer at:

http://www.foodincmovie.com/

Chipotle offered its consumers free tickets to see the movie. You have to respect the fact that, even though sometimes the way we get our food is not totally pleasant (think meat), and this movie apparently does not sugar-coat things, Chipotle is putting its reputation on the line in support of responsible practices in sourcing its ingredients.

http://www.chipotle.com/#/flash/fwi_food-inc

The Chaos of Conventional vs. Organic Broccoli

514454_tasty_broccoliI heard on NPR that hours before the Tsunami hit Thailand, various animals were seen running away from the shore, uphill. The NPR guest (sorry I don’t have his name) explained that in chaos theories explaining “the ways of the world” this type of phenomena is uncomfortable because it can’t be explained by logic. These animals are responding purely to an instinct.

It made me think of an observation my wife and I have had with our 2-year old son, Mac. Our grocery sells both conventional and organic produce. We buy a good deal of organic, but are not fanatical. With two squirmy kids in the cart, we usually just grab whichever broccoli we pass first. But over the last year, we’ve noticed that Mac devours the organic broccoli, and generally leaves the conventional alone. I’ve personally noticed that the organic broccoli tastes better, but wondered if it’s just because I paid more for it. Mac may have the same perception of “price = palatability,” but kids are so magical – I wonder if his instincts are telling him what nourishes him best – what’s pure and what’s… less than pure.